Skip to main content

Optimize Collaborative Finance: Plug Revenue Leakage with SunTec’s Trusted Solutions

Sibos 2023 with its theme of ‘Collaborative Finance in a Fragmented World’ comes at a time when the world of banking and financial services is experiencing a great transformation. Customers want uberized services from their banks who now have access to new technologies that can deliver this hyper-personalized on-demand experience. At the same time, unprecedented global events ranging from a pandemic to a war in Europe have led to significant market disruption, increasing pressure on revenues, and scrutiny on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) priorities. The sector is now actively exploring innovative new technology and business strategies that offer customers the seamless, hyper-personalized service they expect, while maximizing revenues and meeting ESG priorities. From embedded banking and sustainable finance to digital currencies and cross-border payments, the world is witnessing a new era of banking that demands collaboration, partnerships, and innovation amidst great economic and geopolitical uncertainty.

Decoding Collaborative Finance

What does collaborative finance mean? It can be described as a financial transaction between two individuals without the direct involvement of a bank to facilitate the transaction. Some examples of collaborative finance include virtual currencies and peer-to-peer lending platforms. The ease, convenience, and security of such banking models have led to increasing demand not just amongst individual customers but also in the B2B segment. Merchants want to be able to facilitate and process cross-border payments easily. They want to offer innovative credit solutions like ‘Buy Now Pay Later’ and more. Fintechs and tech giants offer these services and this space is expected to reach USD 1.51 trillion in annual revenue by 2030, amounting to almost 25 percent of all global banking valuations. KPMG in its ‘Pulse of Fintech’ report2 states that in the year 2021, the Americas saw an investment of $105 billion and the EMEA region saw investments totaling $77 billion in the fintech space. Over the last three years, the sector has witnessed increasing number of strategic partnerships as banks look to modernize their services with cloud-native fintechs. These fintechs aim to leverage banking data, reach, and trust. But even as they surge ahead with new collaborative solutions and business models, a key challenge that financial institutions need to address is that of revenue leakage.

Understanding and Addressing Revenue Leakage

Approximately 1 to 5 percent of Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, and Amortization (EBITA) is lost unnoticed because of inefficient contract and payment management. While most banks have been on accelerated digital transformation journeys, the focus has not been consistent across all functions. For instance, enterprise billing or account analysis have been left behind in the race to digitize. Several functions are still dealing with manual processes with the possibility of human errors, as well as a highly fragmented infrastructure with multiple systems used by different departments with no single source of accurate data. For instance, banks leave money on the table due to a lack of accurate monitoring of free trial period offers or no clarity between billing cycles and contractual obligations to offer a product or a service. This complexity will only increase as banks accelerate their open banking journeys with multiple partners in a large ecosystem.

Real-time insights and a single view of the entire customer relationship is a key differentiator for banks and a critical factor in plugging revenue leakage, especially as market disruptions intensify. 6 out of 103 banks say real-time account balance information is important for corporate customers, but only 41% of banks can fully meet client needs. 49% see error-free billing as an important essential service, but only 41% are equipped to deliver it. 97% of banks say they are looking at addressing market pressures to improve corporate banking services.

The SunTec Advantage

The good news is that modernizing your banking functions and plugging revenue leakage doesn’t need to be an expensive, time-consuming, or risky affair. A robust middle layer platform can enable you to manage and optimize revenue effectively. SunTec offers a cloud-native and micro-services-based revenue management platform that can help you plug revenue leakage at different stages of the revenue life cycle. With the SunTec solution you can design personalized and contextual deals and offerings and ensure accurate pricing and billing across dynamic customer segments and prevent revenue leakage. It can help mitigate risk and ensure regulatory compliance in real time as well as monetize partner ecosystems with a unified product catalog and enable a fair value exchange. In fact, SunTec has helped a leading bank in the USA modernize and overhaul its account analysis functions to plug more than USD 10 million in revenue leakage4. The bank was able to add USD 500,000 annually with SunTec’s flexible pricing modules and ultimately increase revenue by USD 200,000 by applying tiered pricing to one service.

The banking sector is undergoing rapid transformation now in a market context that is disruptive, unstable, and fragmented. There is great innovation underway as banks and fintechs collaboratively gear up to meet customer expectations and ensure profitability. But even as new banking models and partnerships emerge, it is crucial to ensure an unremitting focus on revenue management and optimization.

Meet Us at Sibos ‘23

If you would like to learn more about how SunTec can help your bank maximize revenue using our proprietary software, meet us at Sibos 2023. Please fill in your details here, for an in-person meeting in Toronto.

Sources

1.BCG

2.KPMG

3.SunTec

4.SunTec

Accelerating Core Banking Transformation: The Luxoft-SunTec Alliance

The banking industry is undergoing a remarkable transformation driven by evolving customer expectations, competitive forces, regulatory shifts and technological advancements. To keep pace with this dynamic financial services landscape, Luxoft and SunTec Business Solutions have forged a strategic partnership. This collaboration is set to modernize core banking operations and deliver unprecedented value to customers.

Integrating innovations: Luxoft’s Hogan meets SunTec’s Xelerate

Luxoft’s Hogan system is a powerhouse in core banking, designed to streamline financial operations with features like customer information management and transaction processing. Its customizable nature allows banks to adapt it to their unique requirements, ensuring seamless integration with existing systems. With an intuitive interface and automation capabilities, Hogan boosts operational efficiency, minimizes errors and speeds up decision-making.

Hogan not only supports industry compliance and advanced security for financial data but also enhances customer experiences with real-time updates and a unified customer view. This robust solution equips banks to stay agile and innovative in a dynamic banking landscape.

A unified banking solution 

The partnership unites Luxoft, a division of DXC Technology, with SunTec Business Solutions, integrating SunTec’s revolutionary SunTec Xelerate platform with the established Hogan core platform. This integration aims to enrich Hogan with capabilities to serve diverse business segments like retail, corporate and investment banking.

SunTec Xelerate, a cloud-native platform, is crucial in this collaboration and offers advanced product management, pricing, revenue management, and partner ecosystem management capabilities, thereby enhancing the overall customer experience.

Responding to evolving consumer expectations 

As highlighted by Stephen Greer in his report ‘Helping Banks Adopt Customer-Centric Product Strategies’, banking customers now seek more personalization and proactive services. The collaboration responds to this need, moving towards holistic product management, dynamic bundles, and expanded ecosystem partnerships.

Leveraging IBM Z for efficiency and security 

Both Hogan and SunTec Xelerate rely on the IBM Z platform, renowned for its scalability, agility and security. This reliance further ensures a secure environment for mission-critical tasks, aligning with Hogan’s approach to optimizing and modernizing core operations using hybrid cloud solutions.

Voices of leadership: Embracing the future of banking 

Anthony Coppellotti of Luxoft and Amit Dua of SunTec express their enthusiasm for the partnership. They emphasize the combination of SunTec Xelerate’s modernity and flexibility with Hogan’s reliability, foreseeing a seamless integration of modern applications into traditional banking systems.

Toward a comprehensive banking experience 

The Luxoft-SunTec collaboration extends beyond technology integration. It explores specific use cases and integration patterns for banks, including relationship-based pricing and behavior-based loyalty programs. The objective is to transform customer experiences and innovation capabilities.

The impact of co-location on IBM Z 

The co-location of SunTec’s Xelerate on IBM Z with Hogan’s core platform promises to enhance infrastructure efficiency, integration, security and cost-effectiveness. This strategic move is poised to bring substantial benefits to banks handling large volumes of operational data.

Conclusion 

The Luxoft and SunTec partnership is more than a technological alliance; it’s a vision for the future of banking. By leveraging their combined expertise and the power of IBM Z, they aim to enable banks to adapt and innovate, offering cutting-edge services in an ever-evolving financial world. This collaboration is not just about streamlining operations; it’s about unlocking new possibilities for the banking industry.

This article was originally published in Luxoft

Unveiling the Magic of Authenticity: The Project Manager’s Guide to Building Trust

Ah! The rollercoaster ride of project management! After a decade and a half of navigating the twists and turns, it’s become crystal clear that without the secret sauce of authenticity, this ride can quickly turn into a haunted house of missed deadlines and shaky relationships. Trust me, you don’t want to get lost in that spooky mansion!

Picture this: you’ve got a team juggling more tasks than a circus performer, clients breathing down your neck like a dragon in pursuit, and stakeholders peering over your shoulder like eager spectators at a magic show. What’s the trick to keeping everyone on board and not sawing your project in half? It’s simple – authenticity!

Let’s break it down. Authenticity is like the project management version of a trust fall. When you’re transparent about the challenges you’re facing, it’s like saying, “Hey, team, I’m not wearing a safety net, but I trust you to catch me!” Now, imagine you’re the captain of a ship sailing through stormy seas of deadlines. Your crew is looking at you with wide eyes, hoping you’ve got the map to navigate through this mess. Being authentic here means you don’t pretend to be a mythical sea god with all the answers; you’re honest about the uncertain waters ahead. You might crack a joke about the tempest to lighten the mood, showing your crew that even in turbulent times, you’re all in the same boat.

What really works in such a situation is being authentic and willing to do anything possible, thus ensuring that trust is retained.

Here are some tips from my life as a Project Manager:

    1. Embrace Transparency: Imagine you’re unravelling a mysterious plot. Keep your team in the loop about project developments, even the unexpected twists. Transparency builds trust — show your team you trust them enough to share the full story. Similarly, keep your clients informed about project progress and any hurdles encountered. Transparent communication with clients fosters a sense of partnership and reassures them that you have their best interests at heart.

 

    1. Show Vulnerability: Remember, even superheroes have their weakness. Admitting when you don’t have all the answers or when you’ve made a mistake humanizes you. It shows your team and clients that you’re not afraid to be genuine, fostering an atmosphere of understanding and cooperation. Sharing the project’s challenges with clients, along with your strategies for overcoming them, demonstrates your commitment to their project’s success and solidifies their trust in your abilities.

 

  1. Encourage Open Dialog: Picture a roundtable discussion in King Arthur’s court. Encourage your team to voice their ideas and concerns freely. Actively listen and consider their input. This not only fosters a culture of inclusivity but also demonstrates your respect for their contributions, building a robust foundation of trust. Similarly, encourage open communication with clients, inviting their feedback and insights. By valuing their input, you strengthen the client-manager relationship, fostering a collaborative atmosphere built on trust and mutual respect.

In an ever-unpredictable journey of project management, authenticity stands as the reliable compass guiding us through the murky waters of deadlines and expectations. So, my fellow project adventurers, remember the magic of authenticity: embrace transparency, don’t be afraid to show vulnerability, keep the conversation flowing, and lead by example. With these tools in your project management kit, you’ll not only build trust but also weave a tapestry of solidarity and success, turning even the most daunting challenges into feats worthy of legend.

Why Should Your Pricing Strategy Consistently Evolve?

The News

Wilko is, or probably was, a high-street retail chain, famous for selling homeware and household items, at a low price. But recently, it faced significant financial difficulties and allegations of poor management.As a result, in September 2023, Wilko sold off its brand name, website, and intellectual property to The Range, another retail chain.

This brought an end to a nine-decade history. The demise of Wilko has several lessons for other organizations on the need to evolve their pricing strategy as customers and their demands change.

The Insight

Wilko always played a significant part in the lives of British citizens. With more than 100 stores widely distributed across the UK, it was the de-facto shopping destination for household products. Established in 1930 by James Wilkinson, the store had close to 500 stores at its highest point. It was always a family-run business with James Wilkinson, his son, and his granddaughter at the helm of the business.

The early success of Wilko can be attributed to the fact that its low prices resonated with the prevailing economic situation during The Great Depression. People valued anything that was functional and at a low price. And things stayed the same even after the Second World War as shopping at Wilko became a habit rather than a novelty.

But things started taking a turn for the worse around 2018 when Wilko touched its highest revenue followed by a steep decline in popularity and revenue. And the pandemic certainly didn’t help as Wilko’s supply chain was not resilient enough to withstand the disruption of those years.

But one of the main reasons for Wilko’s decline was its inability to evolve its pricing strategy.

You see, in its initial years, Wilko did not have to compete with other low-cost retailers. Yes, there were some small retail chains, but there were none that could compete with Wilko. Over the years, the emergence of retail chains such as Poundland and B&M intensified the competition. Suddenly, there were other retail chains that were offering similar or even lower prices. Wilko decided to persist with its low-cost strategy despite having no means to engage in a long-haul price war. The lesson – you can compete on price only when you have deep pockets or the certainty of winning in the long term, but it is not advisable to get into a price war as it can get ugly.

Wilko’s persistent focus on price alone meant that it ignored its core strength – its product portfolio. As customers change, and as their expectations evolve, it is important for organizations to revamp their product portfolio and pricing strategy. But Wilko did not do either of these and ultimately paid the price.

It is also important to note that Wilko was always conceptualized to be a high-street retail chain but with a focus on traditional town centers that were meant for customers without cars.2 But after the pandemic, customers preferred larger retail outlets, even if they were far away from the town. Rival chains had moved their stores to out-of-town retail parks that offered cheaper rents, cheaper business rates, and free parking.In fact, organizations came up with innovative pricing approaches to attract shoppers to their far-flung stores. For example, IKEA came up with a pricing approach called “Pay with your time,” through which customers traveling to its IKEA stores were given discounts based on the distance they traveled.4 Wilko never adopted any of these innovative pricing approaches and were not able to keep up with its competitors.

The pandemic also changed customers’ buying habits and their aspirations. With travel being limited, a large portion of Wilko’s customers had money to spare which they were investing – as evident from the growth of the stock indices in the years that followed the pandemic. Their ability to pay and willingness to pay shifted, but Wiko’s prices did not pace with this change. There was also the problem of its inconsistent pricing strategy across its retail and online channels.5 This further led to inflationary pressures. But, because Wilko was stuck in its trap of low-cost pricing, with a not so resilient supply chain, they faced tight margins – one of the first nails in the coffin. In hindsight, a more flexible, consistent, and agile approach to pricing would probably have helped.

Wilko failed to understand the changing consumer and their evolving requirements. As a consequence, they were unable to compete with firms such as IKEA and Dunelm in terms of the value of their product offerings.Remember, value drives the price, and this reduction in value meant that customers moved away from Wilko. In other words, organizations must aim at a strong understanding of the value that their customers expect and must align their prices accordingly.

It is an irony that Wilko, which stepped into the gap created by Woolworth’s demise in 2008 succumbed to pressures that initially helped it succeed. Part of the British culture, and a one-time leader in the ‘value’ shopping category, Wilko would have continued to flourish, if it had evolved its pricing strategy, and probably had a more consistent leadership. But its downfall certainly offers important lessons in pricing for the other players in the industry, especially those who aspire to be leaders in providing products that deliver great ‘value’ to its customers at low prices.

10 Questions to Ask and Answer to Get Your Price Right

People pay all that money to sit in a chair in the theatre mainly because it is a respectable way to see and experience things they cannot see and experience in their own lives. – Elizabeth Ashley

Note: The idea for this artefact was inspired by the article “5 Questions to Consider When Pricing Smart Products” by Nicolaj Siggelkow and Christian Terwiesch published in Harvard Business Review in July 2019. I thank them for their wonderful ideas

The Price for a Cup of Tea

My hometown, Thiruvananthapuram, situated in Southern India, has numerous teashops across its streets. Some of them are big and some of them are small. Priced competitively, these teashops sell everything from tea and coffee to freshly made snacks. These teashops are also popular amongst office goers not just for its price, but also because of how easy it is to buy, consume, pay, and walk away – the snacks are already ready, the tea takes hardly a minute to make, and the payment is mostly in the multiples of INR5 or INR10. No wonder some of the more popular teashops in Thiruvananthapuram sell more than 1,000 cups of tea every day.

They are also quite popular for one more reason – they do not increase their prices at the drop of a hat when the prices of milk, sugar, or tea powder go up. In fact, if I remember correctly, the price of a cup of tea, with milk, sugar, and enough tea powder has been INR10 for the last few years. Even though the price of milk has gone up by nearly 60% in the last five years.[1]

But why did they not change their price frequently? And it prompts a larger question – why don’t more established restaurants change their prices frequently?
One of the reasons that teashops don’t change the price of tea, or snacks is the fact that the price of INR10 is easy to handle and calculate. For the shopkeeper as well as for the customer. You see, during peak times, these shops sell more than 5 cups of tea a minute, and it becomes tough to calculate the price of different orders and give back change when the prices are not easy numbers. Imagine the trouble of giving back INR9 to a customer who ordered 3 cups of tea and gave INR30 to the shopkeeper.

While I enjoyed my cup of tea at the same price, my friend told me that some of the teashops had recently increased the price of a cup of tea from INR10 to INR12. For someone who has nearly 3 to 4 cups of tea or coffee a day, this sudden price increase can disrupt personal spending. But I was more intrigued about the odd number – twelve – which was the new price for a cup of tea. It was not easy – to handle or calculate.

My friend also had a possible explanation for this price increase to an odd number. He said that in the last two years, the way people pay at the teashops has changed. From giving coins and notes, people are now using their phones and paying through their digital wallets. For some of the most crowded teashops which happen to be near offices, we can safely assume that more than three out of every four transactions happen through their mobile phones, thus eliminating the need to handle cash.

You see, the way we make the payment decides the price of an item. Moving from a physical process to a digital process helped the seller to charge nearly twenty percent more than he usually would have while ensuring the customer does not have to face the prospect of a reduced cuppa. Or in other words, the answer to the question of how we make a payment is an integral part that decides the price of an item.

There are other questions too that will decide the price of a product or a service. And as you read through the list of questions, it is important to remember that all factors may not play a critical part in the price of the product or service but multiple questions and their answers may be important in deciding the price of an item.

Some Important Questions

I believe that the price of a product or a service is decided by the following questions:

1.What is the product that is being paid for?
2.When is the payment being made?
3.Why is the customer paying?
4.Who is paying for the product?
5.Who is using the product?
6.What is the currency that is used for paying?
7.Where is the product bought, and where will it be consumed?
8.How is the payment being made?
9.What is the quantity related factors of a purchase such as how many, how long etc.?
10.What is the context under which the product is bought?

While the answers to most of these questions are straightforward, we need to understand that some of these questions can be tricky to answer and may not elicit a straightforward answer. It is also important to note that all these questions are like a tightly coupled network of nodes. A change that may affect the answer to one question may significantly affect the overall price of a product or a service and may negate or exaggerate the effect of all other questions.

Let us take each of the questions and their impact.

What Is the Product That Is Being Paid For?

Perhaps there are very few quotes in Marketing that are as famous as the one by the legendary Harvard Business School marketing professor who said that “People don’t want to buy a quarter-inch drill. They want a quarter-inch hole!” Or in other words, the real job of organizations is to understand what the customer wants to get done.

Everyone has a need, and this need decides what the product is used for, and ultimately the product or the service itself. This translates to the value the product delivers, which dictates the price of the product. Understanding this can help organizations not only design and price the main product but also design and price its alternatives that will drive optimum results – both for the organization and for the customer.

For example. When Netflix or Disney Plus price their subscription packages, they are not selling access to a catalog of movies, but rather selling unlimited access to entertainment for their customers. The competitors of Netflix or Disney are not just the other streaming platforms, but also movie screens and other platforms like Twitch, the video game streaming platform, or TikTok, the short video platform, that offer other forms of entertainment and compete for the users’ attention and time.

Let us stick with Netflix and other streaming providers for the moment. While Netflix offers an all-or-nothing package for its users, there will be a category of users who may not need a similar package. There will be people who will prefer to pay for each movie as and when they watch it. YouTube Movies offers such customers an option to rent or buy movies from their platform for a fee that is different for each movie and is paid for each movie. While these charges may be close to the monthly subscription cost of some of the leading streaming platforms, the customers are not burdened with the cost of paying a subscription fee every month. Again, the need differs. And hence the pricing. But the customers get faster access to movies before they hit other streaming platforms.

Now, let us look at YouTube Movies. For most of the movies the customer gets two options – access to standard definition content, or access to a costlier high-definition content. For a customer who has access to a high-definition television and wishes to access high-definition content, the costlier option makes sense.

And for anyone who wishes to access a movie without paying anything, the shady channels of Telegram, and risky torrent websites are always there. But they are not free. The chances of being taken for a ride in these options are high – customers either pay with their data or pay with the risk of downloading a virus along with the movie.

You see, the same movie, or in other words, the same product can be available across the channels. Yet, the pricing differs based on the needs of the customer. If you need it faster, and on demand, you pay more. If you are OK with waiting for a few months, you pay a bit less. And if you are trying to save money for your next trip, and want it for free, then take a risk and go to Telegram or click one of the shady-looking links on YouTube that says, “Free full movie for download.”

In short, the product, and the true need to which the product caters, is one of the fundamental questions that need to be answered to decide the price of a product.

When is the Payment Made?

Would you rather pay for your newspaper subscription every day, or would you rather pay at the beginning of a month, or at the end of a month? All three modes exist in the world of the publishing industry and each of them has a different impact on pricing.

The New York Times costs nearly $4 for the home delivery of its editions from Monday to Saturday and the Sunday edition is a bit more costly. The digital edition costs $1.50 per week, and if you take an annual subscription (or in other words, you pay early), the costs are far less. Let us also not forget the frequent promotions that New York Times runs to attract more subscribers. Ultimately, the price of a New York Times subscription is decided by the time that you decide to make the payment.

The time of the payment differs in many ways and drives the price in more ways than you can imagine.

For example, we live in a world where the price of the insurance policy for your car may differ based on the number of miles that you drive.[2] You drive more, and you pay more. And it makes sense. If you drive more, the chances of an accident are higher, and it is logical that you pay more for insurance. Rolls Royce charges airlines not for the engines that they deliver, but by the number of hours that the airlines use their engine for.

In fact, the subscription economy has changed the concept of ‘when’ we pay. From a world where the price was paid upfront, we live in a world where we pay every month, or when we use something. This shift is evident across the world. Companies like Microsoft which were traditionally reliant on license revenue have moved onto a subscription-based model and earning big bucks.

Why Is the Customer Paying?

Customers buy a product or avail themselves of a service because they need to address a fundamental need. And the true fundamental needs that are addressed decide the price of a product.

Let me explain with an example.

A fast-food restaurant chain wanted to improve its revenue by pricing its products better and they hired a consultant to do the same. Based on research, they found out that the milkshake was one of the biggest contributors to their overall revenue, and the restaurant chain wanted to improve the pricing of its milkshake to get better revenue. As HBR points out, “the researcher spent time seeking to understand the jobs that customers were trying to get done when they hired a milk shake. He chronicled when each milk shake was bought, what other products the customers purchased, whether these consumers were alone or with a group, whether they consumed the shake on the premises or drove off with it, and so on. He was surprised to find that 40 percent of all milk shakes were purchased in the early morning. Most often, these early-morning customers were alone; they did not buy anything else; and they consumed the shakes in their cars. The researcher then returned to interview the morning customers as they left the restaurant, shake in hand, in an effort to understand what caused them to hire a milk shake. Most bought it to do a similar job: They faced a long, boring commute and needed something to make the drive more interesting. They weren’t yet hungry but knew that they would be by 10 a.m.; they wanted to consume something now that would stave off hunger until noon. And they faced constraints: They were in a hurry, they were wearing work clothes, and they had (at most) one free hand. Sometimes, he learned, they bought a bagel. But bagels were too dry. Bagels with cream cheese or jam resulted in sticky fingers and gooey steering wheels. Sometimes these commuters bought a banana, but it didn’t last long enough to solve the boring-commute problem. Doughnuts didn’t carry people past the 10 a.m. hunger attack. The milk shake, it turned out, did the job better than any of these competitors. It took people twenty minutes to suck the viscous milk shake through the thin straw, addressing the boring-commute problem. They could consume it cleanly with one hand. By 10:00, they felt less hungry than when they tried the alternatives. It didn’t matter much that it wasn’t a healthy food, because becoming healthy wasn’t essential to the job they were hiring the milk shake to do. Once they understood the jobs the customers were trying to do, however, it became very clear which improvements to the milkshake would get those jobs done even better and which were irrelevant. How could they tackle the boring-commute job? Make the milk shake even thicker, so it would last longer. And swirl in tiny chunks of fruit, adding a dimension of unpredictability and anticipation to the monotonous morning routine. Just as important, the restaurant chain could deliver the product more effectively by moving the dispensing machine in front of the counter and selling customers a prepaid swipe card so they could dash in, “gas up,” and go without getting stuck in the drive-through lane. By understanding the job and improving the product’s social, functional, and emotional dimensions so that it did the job better, the company’s milk shakes would gain share against the real competition—not just competing chains’ milk shakes but bananas, boredom, and bagels.”[3]

Ultimately, by understanding the real reason why customers bought their milkshakes, they could price them better, and provide greater value to their customers.

Customers do not buy a product, they buy something, and it can be anything, that gives them value and gives them a solution to the problem they are facing. And this is the answer to the ‘why’ of every purchase. And organizations that understand this will succeed in the game of pricing.

Who Is Paying for The Product?

Do you know what a “pink tax” is? I am not sure who coined this unique phrase, but the term gained popularity in the mid-1990s and 2000s. It refers to the phenomenon in which products marketed to women are priced higher than similar products marketed to men. For example, women’s razors, usually packaged in pink or feminine-colored packing are priced higher than men’s razors even though both may have similar features or functionalities. It is a clear, though an unfortunate example, of a price that differs on who is paying for the product, or who the intended audience of the product is.

Another example can be found from the old times, but thankfully, it is not a case of gender discrimination. The marketplaces of the old times were unique places. It can be considered the birthplace of personalized pricing. And probably the first place to have used the concept of dynamic pricing to its fullest extent. With only a few shoppers and even a smaller number of shops, the shopkeepers instinctively knew about the willingness to pay and the capability of individuals to pay. Through a set of indicators, these shopkeepers, most of whom were experts on body language, could identify the maximum price that an individual would be willing to pay for a product or service. Guess the MRP tag has saved a lot of us.

The answer to the question ‘who is paying for the product?’ has been the basis for two of the fundamental and most practiced innovations in the world of pricing – dynamic pricing, and personalized pricing. This phenomenon, also commonly referred to, and sometimes wrongly referred to as price discrimination, has been driving the way organization price their products for the last several decades.

Every innovation that you see around these days, including surge pricing, or hyper-personalized pricing are off shoots of organizations trying to find an answer to this question. And I believe this phenomenon will continue in the future also, and will probably become stronger as organizations rely on, and leverage humongous amounts of data.

Who Is Using the Product?

The Utama One Mall on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur is huge. Because of its distance from the main city, and because of its new stature, crowds are limited in the mall. But the mall houses some of the biggest brands and has one of the best-reviewed play areas for kids in Kuala Lumpur.

They use an innovative pricing mechanism. They charged anywhere between RM30 to RM40 for a single entry, and if adults need to accompany them, the adults are charged a very low fee of RM8. They know that there is very little adults can do than wait for their kids to play, hence the low price.

Let us consider the reversal of roles. Have you been to a theme park? Chances are the kids will be charged very little, and the lucky ones may be let in for free compared to the adults. Because the number of rides a toddler or a small kid can get on will be limited. That makes sense, right?

It is also an open secret that adults may not hesitate to spend a lot more when they buy a product for their significant other, for their kids, or for their parents.

A lot of the above situations come because of reasons such as the emotional value that a product has, the social norms, the need to celebrate occasions, and concepts such as reciprocity, altruism, and generosity – a lot of which are inbred into humans.

Ultimately, the price of a product is not just dependent on who buys the product but also will be decided by the person who uses the product. And organizations that can find out the real answer will reap unmatched benefits.

What Is the Currency That Is Used for Paying?

Do you know the real reason why a lot of gamers end up spending a fortune on their favorite game, often buying frivolous things such as a unique costume, or a fancy leash for their virtual pet? And do you know the reason why some of these virtual games that have a marketplace built within their gaming ecosystem are so successful, and sometimes have valuations that run into several billion dollars?

The answer to both questions is kind of the same – most of these games do not sell products for money, but they sell them in return for tokens, or a form of virtual currency that is different for each game. Apparently, such virtual tokens create a sense of psychological detachment and promote less careful spending. It can also trigger impulse spending. And thus increase the overall revenue of the organization. And because games want their users to spend more, the price of each of these tokens is ridiculously low.

It is also the reason why people do not mind when they end up spending a lot of time on ‘free’ sites such as Facebook and Instagram. Little do they realize that the currency they are paying with is their data, and it may be worth a lot more than they think. When you sign up for a ‘free’ newsletter, remember that it is not free, but a privilege that you are getting in return for agreeing to share your email id and other details.

You see, it is important for organizations to identify the currency with which they will take payments from their customer – it can be data in many forms, tokens, or other forms of currency. And this will define the true price that the customers will pay for their product or service.

Where Is the Product Bought, and Where Will It Be Consumed?

Why does a bottle of water cost you more when you buy it in your room at a fancy 5-star hotel than when you buy it from a 7-11 or any other convenience store? Why does petrol cost less in Delhi, the capital of India, than in Mumbai even though Mumbai is closer to the petroleum refineries. Why does the latest model of iPhone cost more in India and less in the UAE?

Indians love gold. India, in fact, has the highest per capita consumption of gold.[4] And a significant amount of gold is brought in by the migrants living in the middle east region. Over the last few years, India, in a bid to make the process simpler, more transparent, and favor more import from UAE decided to levy a lesser import duty compared to other nations for gold that is imported from the UAE. Yet, after the reduction in the import duty, Indians apparently imported only two tons of gold from the UAE in the last seven months of 2022 – a significantly and suspiciously low number.[5]

One of the most important reasons was obvious – most of the gold that was being imported from UAE and other Middle East channels was through informal channels, and the cost difference offset the benefits that would have been provided by the reduction in import duty. While this low number may point to other significant problems, it also points to one key fundamental aspect that drives the global economy forward – the price of an item changes across markets, regions, and nations.

A lot of factors come into play when the final price of an item is decided. Taxes, surcharges, tariffs, import and export duties, transportation costs, and exchange costs are just some of these factors. Most of these factors are different across regions and may even be different across different parts of the same country. And hence it leads to a price differential based on where the product is bought.

But wait, will the price of a product change have based on where it is consumed?

Have you heard about the term corkage fees? It is quite famous in the high-end hospitality industry where you end up paying a fee to the restaurants for brining and consuming your own alcoholic or non-alcoholic drinks. It is kind of like a fee that the restaurant collects for foregoing its revenue from selling beverages. But it is a great example of how prices can vary based on where you consume a product or a service from. The hotel industry charging a bit more for takeaway food is also a good example.

Ultimately, the answers to the question – where you bought it from, and where are you going consume it from – will be two of the most deciding factors that will decide the price of an item?

How Is the Payment Being Made?

I usually pay my electricity bill online. It is easier and more convenient. And I don’t have to stand in a queue. But there is a catch. If I use my credit card, I am asked to pay an additional fee of 0.85% and an additional fee as a tax. I guess it is the fee the electricity company must pay to the payment gateway providers. And if I use Internet banking, I do not have to pay any additional charge. And if I use a digital wallet that is connected to India’s United Payment Interface, then I normally receive a discount.

This kind of price differentiation based on the way we make a payment is quite common across multiple industries. Many SaaS companies give you a discount if you take an annual subscription instead of a monthly subscription. E-Commerce companies provide you discounts if you make the purchase with some of their co-branded cards. B2B sellers provide you with a discount if you are ready to commit a large amount upfront and not in monthly installments. As the popularity and price of Bitcoins grew, there were even retailers who were offering a large discount on any purchase made via Bitcoins or any other cryptocurrencies.

The way we pay is a critical factor in deciding the final price of an item. And it is the responsibility of the organizations to make sure that the customers are offered options, and that the price differential between the most preferred option and least preferred option is not too much.

What Is the Quantity Related Factors of a Purchase – How Many and How Long?

“Buy 1 and get 1 free, Buy 2 and get 3 free, Buy 3 and get 5 free” – A typical weekday offer that may be the catchphrase for your regular Every Day Low Price or Deep Discount store.

Or look at the prices across your local Staples or Office Depot store. The prices per unit of products such as paper or ink cartridges go down drastically as the volumes go up. Wholesalers like Costco, Sam’s Club, and BJ’s Wholesale Club are known for offering volume discounts to their members. Because organizations love customers who buy more.

Organizations also love people who sign-up for a long time. As I said before, monthly subscriptions are always costlier than annual subscriptions. Even concepts like tiered volume discounts or progressive discounts are outcomes of this thought process.

A long-term or large enough commitment deserves reward – that is the accepted behavior that drives this drop in price, even if it comes across as an anomaly to the general concept of hyper-personalization and value-driven pricing. And this thought process will decide the price of a product or a service.

What Is the Context Under Which the Product Is Bought?

Forget everything else that was mentioned in the previous pages. Everything else changes when the context changes.

Let me explain with an example.

It was a normal Monday in Sydney on the 15th of December 2014. Monday blues, and a lot of anticipation for the upcoming Christmas. And as people were busy with their lives, a gunman decided to put a spanner in their plans as he held people hostage inside a central Sydney café. As NBC reported, “Sydney’s public transport system was under pressure because of the siege as several businesses in the city, including major banks, evacuated offices and sent employees home.”[6]

It was at this moment that the prices in Uber shot up by nearly 4 to 5 times. Rides were suddenly outrageously expensive. And people complained. The outrage was quick. And then Uber decided to make all the rides free.

But this price rise and the subsequent price drop were because of how the context changed over the day. No other question mattered – the who, when, and where did not matter as much as the context.

And the answer to this is the most important one that defines the price of any product or service. This is the question that also needs to grapple with the concepts of morals, ethics, and the right and wrong of pricing. Whether it is for a rare drug, or whether it is for the price of a snow shovel after a heavy snowfall, the answer and the price that is the outcome of this answer will not satisfy everyone.

The context can come from several factors – the time of the day, the place, the event that preceded the event, the background of the buyer, and a lot more. The best that organizations can do is to understand the true context of any transaction as much as possible and take a judicious approach, even if it may not always be economically viable.

But the answer to this question will always be a tough nut to crack.

The Final Word

Image taken from Research gate

Each of these questions can be considered as the corners of a decagon like the one shown above – each connected with the other, yet independent by itself. The interactions and impact will be complicated, and the way these questions contribute to the final price of a product may not be in the way an organization may foresee. A small change in the answer to one question may create a drastic impact on the way people perceive a product and may change the answers to the other questions also. Each of these questions is important by itself, yet they do not hold significant value if they are not seen along with the other questions.

These questions determine not just the way products are priced but will also determine the overall revenue that these products will generate, the life of the product, and more importantly the value of the product in the eyes of the customer. And hence these questions become more important.

And organizations that can answer the above questions as much as possible will be the ones that will crack the code of pricing.

Sources


[1] Monthly Sugar Price Index; Taken on April 2023;

[2] Pay-Per-Mile Car Insurance: What You Need to Know; Kayda Norman; Nerd Wallet; December 2022;.


[3] What Customers Want from Your Products; Clayton M. Christensen, Scott Cook and Taddy Hall; Harvard Business Review; January 20026;


[4] Top 10 Countries With the Highest Demand for Gold Jewelry; Deborah D’souza; Investopedia; November 2021;

 

[5] Only 2 tonnes of gold imported from UAE despite duty concession; Dilasha Seth and Ravi Dutta Mishra; mint; February 2023;


[6] Uber’s Surge Pricing Near Siege in Sydney Sparks Outrage; NBC News; December 2014;

How Can Organizations Overcome the Resistance to Dynamic Pricing?

The News

Ticketmaster, the online giant in the ticket-selling industry, received a massive backlash from users for the ticket prices for the GUTS World Tour.1 The prices, that went up to almost $400, were publicly criticized as they highlighted the significant economic divide in America.

The blame for the astronomical prices fell on dynamic pricing, which helps platforms adjust prices based on market demand. Dynamic pricing has often been perceived by customers as a form of profit gauging. As I pointed out earlier, more and more organizations will adopt dynamic pricing, and they must find ways to overcome the resistance to dynamic pricing.

The Insight

Concerts are supposed to be inclusive events that bring people from different races, religions, and economic backgrounds into one single stadium. But of late, the prices of musical concerts have been on an upward trajectory, thereby restricting access to musical events to a privileged few.

The adoption of dynamic pricing has further complicated things. Driven by algorithms and complicated further by the emergence of platforms like StubHub, ticket prices reaching astronomical levels have become common. In fact, tickets for one of Bruce Springsteen’s concerts were reported to have reached $4,000.

But organizations love dynamic pricing. It not only helps them get more bang for their buck by giving them the freedom to charge more when demand is high but also helps them reduce the prices of their products when the demand is tepid. Take away the emotions, and dynamic pricing may be the only tool that creates equilibrium in a market driven by human emotions and fueled by human greed. Hence, it is important to see how organizations can overcome customer resistance.

The first thing that organizations can do is to focus on driving loyalty. Loyal customers do not mind an occasional increase in price as they consider their relationship with the organization to be a long-term one. No wonder that airlines and banks have invested a lot in loyalty programs. It not only attracts customers but helps in retaining them even when organizations are forced to raise prices.

Another way for organizations to help customers overcome their resistance to dynamic pricing is to adopt product bundling. This is why cinemas offer free popcorn and the airlines offer free seat selection options. In fact, research has shown that these potentially ‘small’ gifts have the power to transform the end customer experience, especially for high-value purchases.2 Product bundling enhances the perceived value of the product and helps customers ignore the pain associated with frequent price changes.

The third approach to overcoming resistance towards dynamic pricing is one of self-control. Yes, there will be an urge to go overboard when there is the freedom to raise the prices in line with the demand, but there is always a tipping point beyond which customers will start giving up. Uber, Ticketmaster, and many other platforms have learned it the hard way when the prices increased even beyond the wildest imaginations of the customers. Not only did they face huge backlash, but also lost customers who took their business to their competitors. While it is OK to let systems and algorithms set prices, the context of the situations must be also taken into consideration. Surge pricing after a concert may be OK, but surge pricing during a terrorist attack is not. Organizations must retain some humanity, even if algorithms and systems rule.

It is important to regularly communicate the objectives of dynamic pricing and be transparent as far as possible. Customers can forget quickly, and it is important to remind them that dynamic pricing is not just a tool for profit maximization (don’t say that loud), but also a tool for balancing demand and supply and a great way to find better prices (say that loud!). Organizations need to do away with click-bait price, say no to hidden charges, and help customers see all available options across all price points without pushing sponsored options as the most desirable option.

But beyond all this, there is one more thing that organizations must do to overcome the resistance to dynamic pricing. They must educate their employees, partners, and shareholders about the need for and benefits of dynamic pricing. Surprisingly the biggest resistance to dynamic pricing comes from within the organization. It may be because it may be a difficult concept to understand, and possibly explain, for the frontline salespeople, or it may be because of a perceived sense of unfairness. Whatever may be the reason, organizations must take steps to allay these fears and help employees understand and accept dynamic pricing. Open communication, proper training, and aligning employees’ incentives with the company’s pricing strategy can help mitigate these challenges and help organizations onboard their employees in their journey toward dynamic pricing.

Dynamic pricing is all about managing the balance between supply and demand. The suppliers and partners of an organization play a key role in influencing the availability, cost, and quality of products or services, all of which directly impact the effectiveness of dynamic pricing strategies. Hence, the impact of dynamic pricing will certainly be profound for suppliers and partners. Several key enablers of dynamic pricing such as the gathering of real-time data, accurate demand forecasting, supply chain optimization, cost and margin analysis, competitor analysis, understanding of price elasticity, and technology integration will be possible only if the partners and suppliers are fully onboard the dynamic pricing journey.

All said and done, dynamic pricing is still not practiced in the way it should be. But it is an effective pricing strategy that must be leveraged fully and effectively. As the market landscape grows more complex, there will be a definite increase in the number of organizations and industries looking to leverage dynamic pricing. It is important to get started on the dynamic pricing journey with the right objectives and with a well thought out plan of action designed to help address concerns and resistance.

Sources

1. Hindustan Times
2. Research Gate

What Can We Learn from the iPhone’s Pricing Strategy?

The News

Applerecently launched the iPhone 15, at a starting price of $799 going up to $1599 for its most premium model. These prices were expected as Apple has gone all the way in extending its ‘premium’ pricing.

Yet, despite the high prices and a global economic slowdown, Apple is expected to generate record-shattering sales. What can other companies learn from Apple and its pricing strategy?

The Insight

The first iPhone was launched at a much-publicized event in January 2007. Steve Jobs called it a revolutionary device that comes along occasionally and changes everything. It was indeed revolutionary. Never before have people wait in queues to buy a phone and never did a phone brand talk about its sales numbers. And ever since the iPhone launch has been one of the most awaited events by tech enthusiasts.

Beyond the phone, there are actual numbers that reveal a more significant story.

The first iPhone had two variants on launch – a 4GB variant that retailed for $499 and an 8GB variant that retailed for $599, the price of which was reduced to $499 around two months after launch. At the time of launch, it was one of the costliest phones in the market. Yet it beat all market expectations and sold one million phones within 75 days, and ended up selling more than six million phones in total. So much for the prediction made by Steve Balmer, the erstwhile CEO of Microsoft who said that Apple was going to sell zero iPhones.

However, $500 was a considerable sum at the time and the price continues to increase every year. In fact, while $500 was just above 10% of the average per capita income in the U.S. in 2007, the current iPhone prices are nearly 20% of the average per capita income. Evidently, a growing number of consumers are purchasing iPhones, despite their elevated prices. This is something that most organizations would love to emulate and implement – the ability to charge very high (read exorbitant) prices, yet not be bothered by declining sales figures.

But What Is the Secret Sauce?

The biggest learning that organizations can take away from Apple is their ability to communicate the high value of iPhones in the most appropriate way. You see, value often outweighs price in consumer decisions. People tend to buy products based on the value they offer. And because of its high perceived value, Apple has no problems asking for a higher price. You see, as long as the perceived value is greater than the price, customers will pay willingly.

But this high perceived value would not have been possible if not for the great set of features that these phones carry. For example, professionals use iPhones for their photography. In fact, a lot of photographers swear by the utility of an iPhone over a big camera for taking photos in crowded and random places. Further, look at an iPhone launch event, and there are always many firsts. For instance, the iPhone 15 boasts a suite of features that are likely to influence upcoming features in other smartphones over the next few years. There is a reason why people swear by iPhones and its features, and the product differentiation is a strong reason for the same. And let us not forget the premium materials that they use to make their devices. You really can’t complain about the quality of an iPhone.

But you just can’t rely on a superior set of features to do the trick, can you? No one would buy a new phone if it did not offer them an ecosystem of services. Back when the concept of operating systems and platforms was new, Apple pushed forward its strategy of the Apple iOS app store. With an iPhone purchase, the customer gains access to a whole suite of products ranging from Apple TV to Apple Wallet. Apple has built a comprehensive ecosystem of products and services that work seamlessly together. This lock-in effect makes it harder for customers to switch to competitors. It is all about not just making it difficult for the customer to leave your product but making it worthwhile enough for them to stay back.

We also need to remember that the iPhone was not just built for the U.S. market. And its success across the globe offers an insight into how Apple evolved its pricing strategy to stay relevant in different markets. iPhones have always been expensive, and this remains true today. However, in certain markets, their prices are further inflated due to taxes and tariffs. India is a great example. For many years most of us got our friends from the U.S., Canada, UK, or Dubai to bring us iPhones because it was far cheaper there. Even though the cost difference still exists, it is not that much today. Why? Because Apple understood the importance of having different pricing strategies for different markets and acted accordingly. First, they launched the ‘S’ versions in India, a lower-priced alternative to their premium phones in order to reduce the gap between price and the ability to pay. Over the years, Apple has also taken steps to move manufacturing to India to reduce taxes and tariffs and gain more customers. It is all about staying relevant to the market and thinking from a local point of view.

But none of these strategies would have worked if the iPhone was ‘really’ pricey. Yes, a price tag of $599 was high, but Apple used an innovative pricing strategy to offset this high price. They were able to adopt a strategy known as “Subsidy Pricing” or “Carrier Pricing” where the upfront cost of the iPhone is lower than its actual retail price because the carrier pays a portion of the cost, and the customer repays the remainder through their monthly service fees over the duration of a contract. It is like a SaaS pricing model where you reduce the pain of paying a very high price upfront but may end up paying a higher price in the long run. With this, Apple was able to attract more customers than their competitors would have thought of. And as they say, the rest is history. It is also something that investors like Warren Buffet like. Who would not love monthly recurring revenues?

Yes, Apple was, and still is a great brand. But before the iPhone, Apple was a niche organization with a cult following – their MacBooks were not used by the masses. But the iPhone changed their story. And probably the way Apple priced is one of the reasons for this success. After all, who wouldn’t love a chance to price high, yet not be bothered about falling sales.

A Strategic Approach to
e-Invoicing Compliance

e-Invoicing – Not a Choice Anymore

e-Invoice is essentially an invoice, which is generated, issued, processed, and stored electronically, in specific formats. When it is a tax compliance norm, e-invoice must be uploaded on the tax authority’s portal for validation, before issuing to customers, (there are some exceptions to this). The term e-invoicing includes e-invoice, e-credit note, and e-debit note; generally referred as e-Invoice/e-notes

E-invoicing serves two main purposes:

  1. Trade: Here the goal is to achieve greater efficiency at a lower cost, with faster collection of due payments. Paper-based manual invoicing is time-consuming, expensive, and error-prone. For instance, in Australia, it was estimated that paper and emailed PDF invoices cost between $27 and $30 to process. It required suppliers to create paper or PDF invoices to print, post or email, buyers to scan and manually enter invoices into their software and expenses were incurred on materials and delivery, along with having environmental impact.
  • The processing cost for e-invoice is less than $10 per invoice. Some countries are encouraging and even making e-invoicing mandatory for Business to Government (B2G) and Business to Business (B2B) trade.1
  1. Tax regulation: For tax authorities around the world, e-invoicing is a strong regulatory control to combat tax fraud. Tax frauds primarily takes place via tax evasion on output supplies and invoice faking using input claim on purchases. Even when more trade is encouraged, these fraudulent practices make Governments lose substantial tax revenue. In some parts of the world, losses experienced are estimated at 30% of annual projected tax revenue.2

According to a report from International Market Analysis Research and Consulting Group (IMARC), the global e-invoicing market reached a value of $ 8.74 Billion in 2021. It is expected to reach $ 29.68 Billion by 2027.3

A Billentis report on expected e-invoice/e-bill volume in 2022 reads as follows:4

Estimated electronic invoices/bills 2022 (billions, rounded)

This is where strong regulation on e-invoicing becomes crucial.

European countries were early adopters, with France introducing e-invoicing as early as the 1960s. Relative tax revenue growth trends in these countries are on an upward trajectory. Many Asia-Pacific (APAC) countries are also fast tracking e-invoicing implementation as a regulatory mandate. Australia, New Zealand, and Singapore are leading the pack, with Singapore having implemented it in 2019. India and Taiwan followed suit in 2020. Saudi Arabia is on track to implement by 1st Jan 2023. Hong Kong, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Vietnam, and South Korea are all set to launch their e-invoicing mandates in early 2023.

These trends and statistics indicate that e-invoicing is not a business choice, but a regulatory mandate by Governments, from the indirect taxation perspective.

e-Invoicing Compliance Challenges from Financial Services Perspective

With high transaction volumes, industries like banking, financial services, and insurance (BFSI), energy, telecommunications and retail are driving the market growth in e-invoicing.

The BFSI sector has been on a digital transformation fastrack and most of the businesses are digitized by now. To undertake an e-invoicing implementation journey effectively, internal IT leaders must consider the framework listed below as a starting point:

  • Data specific
    • E-invoicing requires additional mandatory elements. This can influence data maintenance and processing across multiple systems. Procedural and operational controls must be put in place to ensure maintenance of these additional data.
    • Maintaining links of credit notes to the primary transactions that could be influenced through e-invoicing.
  • Billing capabilities
    • ERP and billing systems need to build additional capability to effectively generate e- invoicing data as per technical specifications and published formats. For example: invoice hash, QR code etc.
    • Ensuring integration with the e-invoice platforms using external APIs as defined by the tax authority of the country.
  • Security specific
    • Encrypting transmitted data, as per E-invoicing specifications.
    • Securely maintaining specific keys like the private key and digital certificate signing ID in non-exportable format.

Best practices across existing billing processes and operations will need the following changes:

  • e-Invoice and e-note can be issued only after successful registration on the tax authority’s portal
  • Issued e-invoices and e-notes will need to have additional mandatory elements as defined by the relevant e-invoicing standards. For Example., QR Code
  • Strict checks and controls on purchase accounting to ensure that invoices and credit notes issued by vendors are fully e-invoice compliant
  • Effective change management and change transformation across the organization

The e-invoicing process can be even more challenging and complex in the case of multi-country operations.  As it stands, e-invoicing specifications do not have a universal standard yet. This means, a bank with operations across countries will need to have systems and processes catering to the e-invoicing specifications and standards of each designated country.

e-Invoicing Compliance – A Strategic Approach

Being a tax regulatory norm, organizations need to take a cautious approach to meet compliance requirements as non-compliance can have severe consequence. It could include heavy penalty from tax authorities and serious damage to brand reputation.

Here are three key points to be considered by any financial services organization, while strategizing the e-invoicing implementation program:

  1. Segregate tasks and operations
    1. Business data specific changes and processes are completely within the control of the organization. Even with changing regulations, additional business data required must be within the control of the Bank/FI
    2. Technical and security related aspects and logic must be managed by the e-invoicing application
  1. Identify the best e-invoicing implementation solution
    1. Must it be decentralized across multiple billing systems or
    2. Centralized into a single system
  • While there is no universal single answer, for an organization, the recommended approach would be to implement a centralized solution. A decentralized approach may seem easier especially considering stringent timelines. But in the longer run centralized approach will be significantly more effective.
  1. Considerations while selecting an e-invoice application
    1. Functional and technical capabilities to meet the global e-invoicing norms
    2. Single point consolidation of all regulatory rules and capabilities for integration with tax authority portals
    3. Highly configurable capability to adapt quickly to changing regulations
    4. Strong technological architecture and open interfacing capabilities to integrate with a wide array of e-invoicing platforms

Sources

1 Australian Taxation Office

2 einvoicing Journey

3 Research and Markets

4 Billentis

Building Monetization Strategies as an Ecosystem Orchestrator

This is part 10 of our 10-part blog series on Ecosystems. You can find the other blogs in the series here.

Irrespective of the monetization strategy that the orchestrator and the ecosystem stakeholders decide upon, the success of any monetization strategy will lie in measuring each transaction as accurately as possible, monitoring each of these transactions to ensure there is no value imbalance and creating the right monetization strategy across the ecosystem.

Ecosystem orchestrators will have to take a leading role in ensuring that each of the three conditions are met optimally by ensuring that there is a balance between three discrete yet connected elements:
– Overall value delivered
– Value gained by each ecosystem participant
– Value gained by the orchestrators themselves

To ensure that the monetization strategies are justified, the orchestrator will also have to take a leading role in not just creating innovation across the products and the services of the ecosystem, but also innovating the monetization strategies followed across the ecosystem. The surge pricing, although unpopular across a group of users, followed by Uber; or the faster delivery for Amazon Prime customers; or the promotions run by gaming companies to sell value-added services on their game ecosystems are all examples of monetization innovations.

The orchestrator will also have to ensure that the tollgates that are part of the ecosystem are consistently reviewed and upgraded or downgraded based on the goals of the ecosystem. For example, orchestrators may add more tollgates if their goal is quality over quantity or reduce the tollgates or remove them altogether if the goal shifts from quality to quantity.

The orchestrator will also have to ensure that the value they deliver is unique and cannot be substituted by any of the ecosystem partners or cannot be overridden.

The orchestrator will also have to realize that the monetization strategies that work in a geography will not necessarily work in another geography. For example, the strategy of charging users for listing their products backfired for eBay whereas Taobao, the Chinese equivalent of eBay, was able to capture the market because it allowed the users to list their products for free and charged a small fee for each successful transaction.1

Ecosystem participants, including the customers, partners, and the orchestrators will also have to realize that the subsidization that each of these stakeholders encounter in the ecosystem is not really subsidization, but a price that the ecosystem participants pay indirectly to ensure better services, but at the cost of greater competition. Resources are finite – that is a global maxim. When the prices for entry in the supply side or the demand side are subsidized or free, the number of participants in the same side increase and these participants compete for the existing resources on the other side. For example, because there is no entry fee for Uber users, the number of users who compete for the finite set of resources on the other side (in this case, the fleet on the road) increasing, may cause some users to miss out on getting the necessary product or services at the required time.

What are the Two Factors That Will Drive the Success of the Right Monetization Strategy?

Apart from choosing the right monetization strategy, the key to success for any monetization strategy will depend on two factors:

– Designing a compelling value proposition
– Ensuring the right data is available for the right stakeholder at the right time

Designing the value proposition is not just arriving at a set of contracts that will lay down the rules of engagement between the ecosystem orchestrator, but also defining the flow of value between each of the ecosystem participants. For example, the value that an ecosystem participant may leverage by being part of an e-commerce ecosystem will be the user profile – likes and dislikes – that the ecosystem participant can use to create personalized products for the end-user.

This is where the power of data comes into the picture. The orchestrator of the ecosystem, by virtue of the ecosystem architecture, is the ‘pseudo’ owner of tons of data about not just the ecosystem end users, but also the ecosystem participants.

We live in a time where data privacy and data security are national issues and it is increasingly important that the orchestrators of the ecosystem act responsibly while keeping in mind the potential that this data holds not just for the ecosystem providers, but also for the end-users who can benefit from getting the right products or services that are relevant to them rather than being bombarded with offers for products or services that they do not need.

This data is not just the data of the end customers. It also includes the reviews that customers give for each product or service. This could be the reviews on Google, Amazon, or TripAdvisor, or any other data that indicates key trends – like the trend of shopping for groceries across weekdays, etc.

Sharing these insights derived from such data in a transparent yet protected manner will help make the ecosystem providers take the necessary steps to improve their products or services, while also helping the customers in an ecosystem to take the right decision when buying a product or procuring a service.

Hence, the orchestrators will have to take lead in ensuring the right balance between privacy and potential. Orchestrators will also have to take lead in transforming the data into meaningful insights that each of the ecosystem stakeholders can leverage.

What Does the Future Hold?

Ecosystems may soon witness these trends:

Emergence of a finite set of large ecosystems driven by the need of the customer

McKinsey predicts that world will move towards 12 ecosystems that will arise in place of many existing industries.2 The rise of a demanding tech-savvy young and upwardly mobile population coupled with the vast improvement in technology through trends such as 5G, IoT, automation, and cloud will be the factors that will drive this trend.

Ecosystems will focus on a more regional level or national level participation

Nations and regions across the world are trying to become self-reliant. They want to reduce the dependence on the outside world.  As the focus shifts to making global partners redundant than focusing on reshoring3, nations and organizations are trying to reduce the exposure they have to the ‘outside’ world.

Ecosystems will be need-driven and mass personalization will be the differentiator
Uber started with solving a simple problem – the need for the customers to move around without having to look for a taxi or without having to bargain with the taxi driver. The solution was simple – a product that connected the drivers with the users. The product tracked the geolocation of a taxi and tagged it to the nearest user who had requested a booking.

The ecosystems of the future will be built on this same concept – addressing a fundamental need while extrapolating the need to multiple industries. The focus on being need-driven coupled with the right set of partners will give rise to the next step in productization – mass personalization. Today, mass personalization is a strategy used primarily by many e-commerce websites to tweak their website to the preferences of the end-user. But with the rise of APIs and modularization coupled with the rise of 3D manufacturing and IoT devices, each customer will get a personalized product or service based on their set of preferences and buying patterns.

 

Sources

1 Taobao VS. eBay China; Professor William Barnett, Xiaoqu Luo and Mi Feng; Case Study – Stanford Graduate School of Business; January 2010

2 Competing in a world of sectors without borders; Venkat Atluri, Miklós Dietz, and Nicolaus Henke; McKinsey Insights; July 2017

3 How to Pandemic-Proof Globalization – Redundancy, Not Reshoring, Is the Key to Supply Chain Security; Shannon K. O’Neil; Foreign Affairs; April 2020

Monetizing an Ecosystem: What’s the Right Way?

This is part 9 of our 10-part blog series on Ecosystems. You can find the other blogs in the series here.

A business ecosystem can survive in the long term only if it delivers value to all its stakeholders. For the customers, it is the sum of tangible and intangible benefits they receive over the price they pay. But for the other partners in an ecosystem, the value can be equated to the profit they generate from the ecosystem, and in very few cases, the profit they are able to generate from other businesses because of their participation in the said ecosystem.

For businesses to grow profitably, they must tap into various monetization opportunities and develop newer propositions to increasingly drive value to its stakeholders. Here are the different revenue opportunities that businesses can leverage:

  1. Charge the User for Each Transaction

This is the simplest form of monetizing an ecosystem. Most of the ecosystems, both B2B and B2C follow this model. Uber charges its customers for each transaction. Klockner XOM charges its customers for each deal. YouTube Movies follows this model too.
However, this depends on two kinds of ecosystems that BCG had pointed out – a solution ecosystem and a transaction ecosystem. For transaction ecosystems which focus on matchmaking, something as simple as ‘charging the user’ will work well. Think Uber and Amazon.

But for a solution ecosystems, where the central orchestrator is at the receiving end of the value exchange, the key will be to divide this acquired value across the complementors and suppliers in a way that justifies their contribution yet recognizes performance. There are no easy ways to bridge the gaps in value distribution and organizations which are ecosystem orchestrators will have to leverage the power of the intelligence layer to consistently improve on the accuracy of value distribution.

  1. Charge the User an Entry Fee or a Perpetual Fee

With the rise of the subscription economy supported by the tremendous growth of SaaS software, ecosystems now have a business model in which they can charge the user or the end customer an entry fee allowing further free transactions or continue charging the end customer on a recurring basis. For instance, Netflix gives its users the option to sign up to a variety of monthly subscription plans to have access to the services. This enables the ecosystem orchestrator to have a steady stream of revenue but on the flip side, it is not suitable for a transaction platform unless matchmaking is of the highest quality.

In the real world, it may not just be an entry fee or a perpetual fee that will act as the toll gate to this mode of monetizing ecosystems. Ecosystems follow this business model when they want to either test the waters or are confident of the value their products and services offer to offset the price the customers pay to overcome the toll gate.

  1. Charging a Select Tier of Users

YouTube Music, one of the many products in the entertainment streaming market, follows a different pricing model. It lets its users listen to music for free, but if the users want the ability to listen to music even when the phone screens are off, they need to pay a subscription fee. It is an ecosystem where both the ‘commoners’ and the ‘aristocrats’ have a say. This fee or monetization model can be in lieu of other benefits. For example, YouTube offers its subscribers a premium model in which the subscribers can watch YouTube videos ad-free. Even banks follow this model through their products which more often than not, follow a tiered pricing model – customers paying a fixed or recurring fee in lieu of other products or services, whereas the bank can also leverage the market of customers who are not willing to pay. This also is akin to a business model where a certain set of ‘base’ features are free for every user in an ecosystem, but to leverage the wider potential of the ecosystem, the customers will have to pay a fee.

  1. Charge the Ecosystem Contributors Other Than the Customers

Imagine a market, or a shopping mall. It is a smaller version of an ecosystem, and certainly a successful model because it has been with us in many forms over the last several decades. In a shopping mall ecosystem, the ecosystem orchestrator is the organization which owns the shopping mall or runs the shopping mall on behalf of its owners. Customers do not pay a fee to enter the market or the shopping mall, nor do the shops in the mall pay a percentage of fee for the transaction that the customer makes.

The orchestrator obtains value (and in this case the money) from the rent the shopkeepers pay (on a monthly basis or annual basis) to set up their shops. The role of the orchestrator is to bring together a wide variety of shops which offer a wider variety of products and services to customers. In this way of monetizing an ecosystem, the orchestrator charges the producer and not the customer. For instance, Amazon marketplace, and several other marketplaces and e-commerce websites follow this model in which they charge the merchant for selling on their platform.

  1. Charge a Third Party Who Is Neither a Producer nor a Consumer

Most of the content producers on platforms such as YouTube do not spend money on the content they create. These ecosystems earn money from a third party – the companies which put ads on these platforms. These ecosystems are in fact the world’s largest ecosystems today where the producer and the consumer merge to become the prosumer, a term coined in 1980 by the futurist Alvin Toffler in his book The Third Wave. These ecosystems have the power to scale up exponentially and create value in multiples for its stakeholders, if managed correctly. Facebook, YouTube, WeChat – all are exponents of this ecosystem who have been able to create value in billions of dollars.

  1. Charge Everyone (Or Anyone Based on The Need)

This is an amalgamation of the previous monetization models. In this ecosystem, the orchestrator creates and implements different monetization strategies for different stakeholders. The LinkedIn ecosystem is a good example for this. The end customers, or the LinkedIn users have the option of creating a free profile or a premium profile. Companies have the option to engage with LinkedIn and leverage its plethora of services through different modes, many of which are paid. LinkedIn, after its acquisition by Microsoft, also has the power to connect to the Microsoft Office Product Suite1. The LinkedIn ecosystem is in fact a whole lot wider with LinkedIn bringing in products like SlideShare and data analytics services to their ecosystem.

This ecosystem and the other types offer a multitude of possibilities and opens a whole world of monetization opportunities not just for the ecosystem orchestrator, but also for the different stakeholders in the ecosystem, and hence can be considered as the ecosystem model with the highest monetization potential.

Sources

1 LinkedIn and Microsoft: It’s All About the Ecosystem; Boundless Markets; https://boundlessmarkets.com/linkedin-and-microsoft-its-all-about-the-ecosystem/; Retrieved on 22 Jul 2020